Paul,
I just want to let you know that your keeping us up to date on your whereabouts and your progress on your boat has really caught my attention. You know by now that I am a fan especially of the "original" Newporter. It has been my first reaction to dislike anything that was not a "standard" Newporter. I have found that "standard" seems to mean the Newporter as it was built to Ack's standards in regard to his design. Therefore if I bought a Newporter built before "my time" as a builder I would want to upgrade it to those standards. If I bought any, regardless of when or where it was built, and things were changed by the various owners, I would change things back to the Ack design. Boy, was I narrow minded. In my defense, the long friendship Ack and I developed during our years of our employer/employee relationship and then on that friendship has surely been the foundation of my way of looking at all Newporters. Now to the meat of this note:
I have become a real fan of your schooner. I even like your bowsprit, which is far removed from being "standard," but is more in the tradition of old time schooners. Also in my favor, I have long ago come to appreciate what changes owners have done to their boats. I have always believed that the owner owns the boat and is free to do to it as he sees fit. I was the master builder when Lee Paterson had his boat built, and it left our yard brand new with a much changed interior. He redesigned the galley and made changes in other places down below, all of which I heartily agreed with. To his credit he also did a lot of the original changes himself, showing himself to be quite a carpenter. He did an awful lot of changes through the years and he must have really liked what he did. I didn't, and if I had that boat now I would hasten to retrofit to the original in those areas. But it was his boat.
In these past months in which you have brought your boat to my attention you have succeeded in building in me a great appreciation of your boat. I really like it. Maybe not to the degree you like it, but the growing change of my idea about your boat has been positive and I thank you for helping me to see the "errors of my ways." You have almost become my hero among owners. Not because you have done anything the other owners didn't do, but, I think, because you have the Newporter I wish I could sail. I've sailed a lot of the ketch rigged Newporters and I rigged a lot of the ketches. I have sailed on schooners, I have sailed sloops, and I have come to believe that the ketch rig is to best to have because of its ease of handling, especially if short handed (I've sailed many of them alone). But I find that your rig, as a stays'l schooner, draws out my 'what to do' feelings for a sail. Though I think your boat may need more hands than my arms have I'm thinking that she would be an easy rig to sail, and a great joy to be aboard.
Again, thanks for getting through my thick head; I'm enjoying the change.
Peace,
Clyde
Views: 123
Tags:
Comment
Well, I am just excited that you read it - I figured everyone would pass it by. If you would like a basic introduction into the units of energy so you can do your own energy calculations I would be glad to do it. By the way, I am just a simple carpenter as well, but I did teach physics for 23 years (until 2000). That damn educational box just got smaller and smaller, and I am a rebellious, and love my freedom - so I left teaching and became a craftsman, or crapsman, depending on your perspective! Anyway, Thanks for the read.....and thank Jan again for the great photos. I especially like the two atolls in the turquoise green sea. Surfs up!
REPOWER WITH ELECTRIC
Here is my Repower with Electric page on my BlogSpot site:
The following is in response to questions asked on Newporter 40 Together. The ultimate question is "Where can you direct me for information?" The following three links will take you to three different sites on electric propulsion for boats. Read them and enjoy.
A lot of people confuse sophistication and complication as progress, but I always considered it stupidity. While I can see that under normal circumstances "throwing money" at a problem can often result in a solution, I would hate to go to sea or be living on a boat that I was totally clueless about - i.e. the Beanute next to you. But that is the way the world is evolving - total dependency on the system - which is an awesome strategy to create helpless consumers.
One thing about the electrical propulsion - just a basic perspective. Let's just consider that a 50 horsepower diesel is adequate for your propulsion needs. A horsepower equals 746 Watts, (both horsepower and watts being a unit of POWER or ENERGY CONSUMPTION OR PRODUCTION PER UNIT TIME)
So 50 horsepower is equal to 37,300 watts. To create that amount of power in real time, straight from 100 watt panels, would require 373 100 watt panels. But of course, that's why you have batteries - to store the energy produced over a long period of time by low power solar, and then have it available for use at high power for a short period of time.
Power x Time = energy (consumed or produced)
A "Watt" is a Joule/sec, Joule being the standard unit of energy.
so a 100 "amp hour" battery (which is assumed in our culture to be a 12 volt battery, but they don't state that)
can, ( considering that Energy = volts x amps (current) x time, which is the Power = energy/'time formula manipulated to solve for energy) hold, ideally,
12 volts x 100 amps x 3600sec = 4,320,000 joules of energy...... and since, for 50 horsepower, you need 37300 joules per second, your battery will last 116 seconds, or about 2 minutes. AND THAT IS ASSUMING IDEALLY, NOT WORRYING ABOUT THE AMOUNT OF HEAT PRODUCED BY THAT HUGE CURRENT. HMMMMMM....TEN 100 AMP BATTERIES WILL GIVE YOU 20 MINUTES AT 50 HORSEPOWER.
Yes, there are all kinds of ways to cut your consumption, and improve your performance, but these calculations give you some realistic idea of what you are up against.
One last calculation - you are stuck in the doldrums, but gosh that sun is beating down on you, and your two 100watt solar panels, producing maximum charging for your batteries at 200 watts, or 200 joules of energy per second. to charge one 100 "amp hour" (I put it in quotes because it is a bastard or incomplete unit) battery, which contains, ideally, 4,320,000Joules, will take 6 hours (or 360 min. or 21600 sec). AND THAT, MY FRIEND, WILL GIVE YOU ANOTHER 2 MINUTES OF ENERGY CONSUMPTION AT 50 HORSEPOWER!!!!!!
So maybe that wasn't quite the last calculation..... as a ball park assume the sun can produce 500 watts per square meter of solar collector. To get the required 37300 watts (50 hp) in real time would require 75 square meters of collectors, so you might need a barge. Of course, all of these calculations can be applied to your sailing shaft energy production as well.
Paul,
Your opinion ought to be everyone’s rule of thumb. My brother-in-law use to say “It’s a poor set of feet that stands around and lets the body suffer”. And you are right about the ability, even of the experts, to predict the coming path of a hurricane is sadly lacking. Last October as Sandy was coming up the coast it was predicted to go scooting up the coast a comfortable distance off shore. Then a couple days before getting to our area the forecasters were saying it will turn 90 degrees or so and head straight in to the Jersey coast and straight across the state into Pennsylvania and then continue west through PA and then north and then northeast and away. The last predictions gave the center of the storm as passing within 7 miles south of us. That was about four hours before its leading edge would hit us. Then, as I looked for the next hourly report it was not to be found. We had some wind, 60-65 mph and gusts over 75, but no hurricane. I found out the next day that it got to about 50 miles offshore heading straight toward us than it blew itself apart and was no longer a hurricane; it became a post tropical storm and changed directions to northerly (with no predictions) and riddled the northern shore area of NJ and into NY. You take your life into your own hands when you blatantly disregard storms.
NOW, TO YOUR ELECTRIC BOAT PROPULSION QUESTIONS: I have put another page in my Blogspot site a bunch of links to give you a start. I got my start by searching for “electric propulsion for boats” or something like that. That turned up a lot of info. What I listed on my site has power enough for a Newporter. Elco seems to have diesel/electric rigs available with a diesel powered generator that can both charge your batteries or run the electric motor (while charging, I think). Their chart, the last link I give, will be most informative. Now, with all that, I did not find my link to another site that I liked, but their largest motor is listed for boats a little smaller than Newporters. Elco speaks of vessels quite a bit bigger than Newporters. Do your research and enjoy the results thereof.
Peace,
Clyde
Paul,
What a testament to Ack and his Newporter. Your report was a joy to read. One of my favorite designers (I have many) would not have a boat smaller than 40 or 45 feet long with an engine. He said that 95% of the problems on a boat was the engine and you use the engine less than 5% of the time. I agree, and I'm thinking now that that I'd replace the fuel guzzler engine for an electric motor (they are available now for boats up to 16000 pounds). You only need the engine to get away from the dock sometimes.
Your amazement of four water systems, etc., must have developed from designers from the house and car building industries who designed boats to give house like systems. The problem is the needed mechanics for a house may live next door--you'd be hard pressed to match that half way across the ocean. Want a good boat? Find a designer who has sailed and who understands boats and boating. Simple systems built to maintain is the way to go, and sailing designers know all about that. And some owners begin to learn that the old ways are the good ways and that if you can do with less you should. It will less trouble. Old Francis Herreshoff knew that. He design a 28 foot canoe yawl with oars for power and a cedar bucket for the head. And he designed it in the 1960's after the start of the "let's make it like a house" philosophy of boat design was already showing its ugly head.
Thanks for the good read, and keep up your good work. Good sailing.
Peace,
Clyde
LINKS ===============
THE ROSTER
Muf, our Keeper of the Roster, has updated it. But he still needs information on boats out there that he doesn't have, like new owners, old owners, where any of the boats are. We don't post the roster on the web site, it is only sent to owners. Please send him anything you might have, or call him at:
909 561 4245
===============
Captain Clyde's Newporter sites:
and
The Ning site has been given a reprieve. I have transferred my Ning site to the blogspot site and will leave it there. I am keeping my Ning site open as a home for my photos and drawings.
Many of my photos there do not relate to Newporters, but a search through my collection may prove useful for your studies.
My drawings are not accurate in many respects as a result of the PAINT program used to draw them, There is no accurate scale and at best they are only useful to indicate some specific detail. Some are inaccurate because of my poor memory. Use them to help you think, not as a detailed presentation of the subject matter.
If any of you want to start a web site I suggest you remember what has happened to both my Ning site and this site (which is a Ning site) and remember that my Blogspot site is free and Blogspot's owner (Google) has promised to keep it that way.
Clyde's email:
Put 'Newporter' on Subject Line. Email is the best way to contact me. I do not regularly look at this site or its messaging system. Email will get to me post-haste.
===============
© 2024 Created by bob mitchell. Powered by
You need to be a member of Newporter 40 Together to add comments!
Join Newporter 40 Together